The measurable technical efficiency is deplorable.
#Post processor for mastercam software#
There rarely seems a focus on what the CUSTOMER is using the software for, or how they use it. Statement: MOST SOFTWARE SOLD TODAY IS CRAP! Then dropped out, largely due to losing my rosy glasses about the industry.
The first time I was involved in making commercially successful software I was 14, wrote some of the 'modules' in my high school computer science class, and went to to Honours in computer science at the University of Alberta. I think a little history helps put context/credence to the opinion I'm going to state. In my part of the world any software or documents made during work hours or on company equipment is their intellectual property by default. (I am a little worried my company might claim rights on it and not allow it to be shared).I suggest you do this work on your own time, away from the office. OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS INĪll of the software I have ever published, includes such in the broiler plate. LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, IN NO EVENT SHALL THEĪUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,įITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included inĪll copies or substantial portions of the Software. To use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sellĬopies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software isįurnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: In the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights Of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
#Post processor for mastercam free#
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy a post that works on these lathes should come with the software), but it's my current plot in life to deal with it. I don't want to join a MC forum, I have a bit of disdain for the product, (and support, i.e. The reseller has yet to able to deliver an acceptable product, even though they should have a post for these machines 'in stock' as we are not the only customer that these lathes in there service areas. Seeing I spend more time getting the output from mastercam to work on the machines, that I do IN mastercam creating the ideas, I know we need something better.
(I am a little worried my company might claim rights on it and not allow it to be shared) I just wan't want my job to suck that much less. I'm not interested in making any money off of such and effort. NCI is proprietary, but does sharing the means to turn an otherwise useless file into useful G-Code, with out he blessing of MC, violate the law in ANY regard? With out "reading and understanding" all the fine print (a task harder for me than making a parser), can I do this under something like this under an MIT license? I assume. I think this is BAD for the industry at large, as it only serves to keep cars, more expensive than my house, in the car park of resellers office. Other companies who do what we do with the same machines (non competitively), are not willing to share what they have, my company won't let me share what I have, because of legal concerns. The question is, should I go through the Herculean effort, can I share it? I've always had a knack for making parsers, and I'm a huge fan of 'Open Source' however this seems go against what we get from the local MC resellers. NCI post processor that doesn't SUCK ASS for the machine I run. I'm taking a computer science, and looking for ideas for my final project, one that comes to mind is making a.
0 kommentar(er)
